Numerous studies have shown that  chiropractic treatment is both safe and effective. The following are  excerpts from a few of the more recent studies. By examining the  research supporting chiropractic care, you will find that chiropractic  offers tremendous potential in meeting today’s health care challenges.
                   
For Acute and Chronic Pain
          Patients  with chronic low-back pain treated by chiropractors showed greater  improvement and satisfaction at one month than patients treated by  family physicians. Satisfaction scores were higher for chiropractic  patients. A higher proportion of chiropractic patients (56% vs. 13%)  reported that their low-back pain was better or much better, whereas  nearly one third of medical patients reported their low-back pain was  worse or much worse.
                   
          (2000)  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics-
In a randomized controlled trial, 183 patients with neck pain were randomly allocated to manual therapy (spinal mobilization), physiotherapy (mainly exercise) or general practitioner care (counseling, education and drugs) in a 52- week study. The clinical outcomes measures showed that manual therapy resulted in faster recovery than physiotherapy and general practitioner care. Moreover, total costs of the manual therapy-treated patients were about one-third of the costs of physiotherapy or general practitioner care.
          (2003)  British Medical Journal-
In comparison to other treatment alternatives, acute and chronic chiropractic patients experienced better outcomes in pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction; clinically important differences in pain and disability improvement were found for chronic patients.
          (2005)  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics- 
In our randomized,  controlled trial we compared the effectiveness of manual therapy,  physical therapy, and continued care by a general practitioner in  patents with nonspecific neck pain. The success rate at seven weeks was  twice as high for the manual group (68.3%) as for the continued care  group (general practitioner). Manual therapy scored better than physical  therapy on all outcome measures. Patients receiving manual therapy had  fewer absences from work than patients receiving physical therapy or  continued care. Manual therapy and physical therapy each resulted in  statistically significant less analgesic use than continued care.
         
                   
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment